

YOU ARE CURRENTLY VIEWING GREEN
CHEMISTRY:
CHEMICAL SUBSTITUTION
Chemicals that
are successful in the market do well because they have
properties that are useful, at an acceptable price. Their
hazards and risks, where known, need to be acceptable
too. The criteria for acceptability have changed over
the years, but there has always been a need to consider
whether a substance or process should be replaced and
whether it is possible. It is clear that the substitute
must, in overall terms, be more sustainable than the original.
Under REACH regulation there will be increasing pressure on substances of very high concern; at the same time consumer pressure means that ordinary commercial competitive advantages will also have an effect. There is no doubt that in the present and foreseeable future:
|
|
There will be regulatory pressures to
substitute |
| |
|
|
|
There will be possible economic benefits to be gained |
BUT
| |
‘Off the shelf’ acceptable
substitution is rarely possible |
| |
|
| |
Substitution via new R & D is time consuming |
Forward-looking research has always
been aware of opportunities and the ‘success stories’ in the Why Take Action section of this website
illustrate this.
Recently, the need for a sustainable
chemical industry has heightened the need for a more active
approach to substitution. Some governments will be impatient
for change. But answers appear to be limited.
So how can Envision Chemistry help?
For several years we have been offering help in chemical
substitution, using tools as described in this web site.
There is no single answer – it
depends upon the need.
STEP |
|
COMMENT |
|
|
|
Define the need and the present
problem |
|
e.g. the market leader is a
persistent, bioaccumulative substance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consider whether an acceptable
existing substance is available as a substitute |
|
'acceptable' meaning a better
hazard and risk profile |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Define an R & D programme |
|
set out performance and acceptability
criteria for the substitute product and the process
needed to manufacture it |
|
|
|
Photography courtesy of Emanuel
Lobeck, Kenn Kiser, Crissie Hardy
|